David Steckel Nackt Wixt (David Steckel Naked Wank)

David Steckel Nackt Wixt  Watch David Steckel Nackt Wixt video on xHamster.

 This compilation video was created and posted on Xhamster by someone else who selected some videos from the Dropbox that contains all photos and videos of me naked. It was created from one video showing me naked and masturbating, and another that shows me naked while inserting a magic marker into my asshole and then leaving it there and masturbating. (It should be known that the magic marker remained in my ass throughout the rest of that day, through the night, and until a necessary trip to the bathroom the next morning allowed it to be released.) The compilation finishes by displaying me naked and masturbating one additional time. 

All videos in the compilation are viewable separately on my own Xhamster page, but the compilation video presents me in a single video. 

The creator of the video asks the favor of  having others view what they have posted of me and to like or comment to them. They have made it clear they greatly appreciate likes and comments. Since it is their page and their work, they will receive any comments made. In this case I am only an object of display since the owner of the page is aware of their complete right to display me naked as desired, which is the same rights that all others have.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/58jgt1168jivmln/3pLYLl1yYE  source of videos

They also created a photo album of me naked, and another small album of gif images.

 David Steckel naked - photos

David Steckel naked gif's  

 The link below is a posting that contains a description of my requirements and obligations for being displayed naked by others, as well as relating the absolute right that all others have to post or display me naked in any manner that can be conceived of.

https://davidsteckelnakedandexposed.blogspot.com/2018/01/david-steckel-naked-requirements-and.html

 

An informational background webpage of David Steckel

 Many for profit websites exist that will provide information on a person's background for a fee or with a paid membership of some kind. I was notified of being on one of these type of sites by someone online. The page of me is a free public "profile" page for the purpose of enticing people to pay for a more detailed informational package.

The site lists my job as being a "Professional Exhibitionist" and as me working for a company called "Naked". The opening paragraphs add even more:

"David is an internet exhibitionist. His primary function and obligation is to be exposed to and seen nude or naked by anyone and everyone. His purpose is nothing more than to be observed naked, exposed, displayed and shown as public property. Simply enter his name in any web search and put naked after it, then choose from the search results. David Steckel can be seen naked on Wikimedia Commons here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:David_Steckel.jpg "

This is similar to one of the five reviews of me posted lower down on the page, but anyone can read these for themselves at: https://www.mylife.com/david-steckel/e793129246386

The intro and the reviews offer a quite distinct description of me. Since the page can be seen to have existed for quite some time already, there's no telling how many times it has been viewed.

An option exists on the page to "Control this profile". I attempted to click this button and received a message that this profile has already been claimed. After attempting to contact the website asking how this could be, I was informed that the person who claimed the page has proven it is theirs and that the information it contains is considered to be valid and up to date. 

Other than some listed associates and neighbors being incorrect, the information there is more accurate about me than might usually be expected to be found on such a site. My listed profession and company are pretty obviously not entirely true, but they do correspond with other information about me there.

Since the page is public and free, anyone at all can see everything there. I unwilling to pay the site for so-called additional information about me, but I if that information was accurate, it might list a civil case I was involved in years ago or being cited for indecent exposure. That last thing only serves to reinforce the accuracy of what is available on the free page about me.

I won't be pursuing the matter any further. Anyone who does any real sort of web search on me and uses the right search words will see that I really can be found naked on the internet quite a lot. That leaves little or nothing about accuracy to be questionable. It's probably not a bad thing that people who might be searching for me see this major aspect about me.

 

There's also the fact that nothing posted of me naked by anyone can be removed once posted, or even requested to be removed. I'm not shown naked on this particular site, but this surely falls into the same category. 

Maybe it's best that I can't change or alter the page in any way. On some days I might think something needs a slight correction and end up making it less accurate in the process. Also, if someone else has claimed the page and wants that information about me to be there, then it's not my place to change it or question it. 

On the more humorous side, I can only wonder what others who share my name might think when they see this page or my actual exposure naked on other websites. It's doubtful any of them have left one of the comments or "reviews" there, but since they're all anonymous they'll always remain unknown.

 

 

First (known) exposure to Facebook contact.

 In prior postings, a punishment that I received for violating my exposure contract is described, and how a poll exists to allow voters to decide whether I would receive a pass on that punishment or if it had to be carried out. A large majority of the votes require for my punishment to be carried out. The punishment requires for links to my online exposure naked to be permanently posted in the contact information on my Facebook page in order for those who know me to view my exposure and to see me naked. 

Poll: https://www.poll-maker.com/poll3242987x72cf4612-100

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75  (Links to my exposure can be found in the contact information there)

The number of people who know me who I am required to be seen naked by is directly connected to the number of votes for the links to remain permanently posted. Each additional vote for this requires that I be seen naked, masturbating, or performing some act naked by one additional person who knows me. I have to provide some evidence to prove this, and it has to be submitted to and approved by my contract holder before it can count as an actual viewing of me naked.

This has occurred for the first time and it was approved as a legitimate viewing of my exposure. The evidence is an image/screenshot that is included here:

So that the privacy of the viewer of my exposure is fully protected, nothing that might identify them is to be revealed. The part relative as evidence that my exposure has been seen has to be provided though, to inform voters that their decision is being carried out. 

Even though this counts as one view of me naked by a Facebook contact, the vote count for the links to be permanent rose by one vote too. Since the majority vote count has to match the number of people who know me who I have to be seen naked by, it leaves me in basically the same place as I was before.

If the vote count for the links to remain goes up faster than I am viewed naked, I will end up further behind and have to be seen naked by even more people who know me. I'm basically resigned this happening unless some proof is suddenly received that I have been seen naked by a lot of people who know me. No matter how many times I might be seen or think I've been seen naked by people who know me, it will not count without proof. 

I've been reminded again that the poll is likely to remain open permanently to allow voting to continue in an unlimited and unrestricted manner. It also seems to mean that the number of votes and the number of people who know me who I have to be seen naked by will be able to climb indefinitely too. 

I'm mostly resigned to this fact too, since I'm either unable to or not permitted to do anything besides for being exposed naked to the required number of people who know me. 

Exposure to Facebook friends: The verdict is in and the public has confirmed that it be carried out

 I have been notified that since the majority of votes in the poll https://www.poll-maker.com/poll3242987x72cf4612-100   is extremely unlikely to change enough to alter the outcome, that the original verdict for my punishment will stand and must be carried out. As far as I know, the poll will remain open and voters will be able to continue voting however they want to. Only its creator is able to decide how long the poll remains open and I've heard nothing yet about any timeline for the poll.,

Even though the poll does remain open, it's been related to me that what the majority of voters have decided must still be honored, obeyed, and carried out in respect of their decision. What was also related to me is a more detailed explanation of what my punishment must consist of. I now know that my punishment goes beyond just a requirement for the links to remain posted for those who know me on Facebook to click on to see my exposure. 

My punishment requires that I am actually and provably seen naked by Facebook friends. I was not given an exact number for how many that might be, but only that it must be a two digit number of them. That only tells me that it is somewhere between 10 and 99. I now know that it has to be a provable view that that there is some evidence , which leaves it unclear how that might work. I can only assume that it means being provable through comments or messages to me. Without proof though, I'm told it will not count towards fulfilling my punishment, so I may end up being seen naked by some friends who never allow or offer any proof that they have seen me naked. 

The only other information I've gotten is that any new friends added that are a result of the poll and its postings do not contribute to the fulfillment of my punishment either, since they are likely to have already been aware of my exposure and viewed it before sending their friend request. 

It feels kind of complex at this point, but what I know for sure is that I literally have to be seen naked by more than a few friends for it to even be considered whether my punishment has been served.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75 

Even with evidence that it was coming to this, it's still a little bit daunting to consider that the links not only have to remain, but that my punishment can only be served if am actually seen naked by many Facebook friends. It's nearly impossible for any of them to view me naked without also seeing me masturbating too, and doing things naked that I prefer not to think about them seeing. I can only wonder which friends will see me exposed naked first, and just how many of them will see me in total before my punishment will be considered to have been served. 

I've been reminded of several ways in which things can become much worse for me if it''s even suspected that I've tried to interfere with the serving of my punishment, so I'm fully aware that there is not a thing I can do about being seen naked by friends on Facebook. All I can really do now is to prepare for any questions or statements made by any Facebook friends after they view me naked. 

Along with the notification I was given, an explanatory image was also provided, which I am to begin including publicly in any related posts or notices. This has occurred before, but this one feels like it is further confirming something that is already certain anyway. 

I can only sum the entire situation up to getting more of what I wanted than I wanted, since I do have an interest in being exposed naked, but Facebook until now was one place where few if any friends were even aware of my exposure online, let alone having seen it. Now it not only seems that they will see it, but they have to see it or else I will only be punished in further and more severe ways. I definitely do not want any of those ways to come to pass, so I can easily see that this punishment is the most lenient that I am going to receive even if it appears harsh to outside observers. 

In the image I was sent for public submission, I may have preferred to be shown naked other than shown masturbating, but the choice was not mine to make. In the notice, I see others again being asked to participate, this time by somehow calling the attention of my Facebook friends to the links. I suppose that it hardly really matters though, since any friends who view my exposure will see much more of me than how I'm displayed in the notice, and my punishment will go on and last until they have seen me anyway. Even though I think it's unlikely for anyone to participate in that way, speeding up the process might not matter much either. In the end, one way or another, I know friends on Facebook as well as an unknowable number of random visitors are going to see me naked, and it's almost entirely unavoidable.

Edit: I was told that there needed to be a clarification about the links to my exposure on Facebook. Although I have to be seen naked by Facebook friends in order for my punishment to be served, it is to be pointed out that the links must remain even afterwards, which will enable them to be viewed indefinitely by all viewers of my Facebook page. 

I was reminded that voters in the poll chose by a large majority for the links to be permanent, and so they must be permanent even when and after a large number of my Facebook friends see me exposed completely naked. I'm also to apologize to any voters who may have been led to believe otherwise, and to thank and express my gratitude towards each and every person who voted in the poll so far regardless of how they voted. 

Please vote in the poll: Links to the exposure of David Steckel in his Facebook contact info?

A poll currently exists allowing others to vote (anonymously by default) on the topic of whether links to my exposure should be or remain in the contact information of my Facebook page.
The poll is at: https://www.poll-maker.com/poll3242987x72cf4612-100
 

The links are already required in that location, so it's not clear to me why this poll is necessary, and since I've already been informed that the links must remain permanently.
It might just be more of a survey than a poll, just to see what opinions others may have when voting is entirely anonymous. I can't be sure, but if there is enough "no" votes, then maybe sometime soon the links may not be required.
An image of the links actually on my Facebook page can be seen below, and the my actual Facebook page and the links can be seen at:
https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75

 

The links that are currently required in my contact information on Facebook are: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/58jgt1168jivmln/3pLYLl1yYE 

https://twitter.com/davidsteckel1 

https://photos.app.goo.gl/Mm7gGM9zctNPAr6d6

Your vote is appreciated.

Edit - I have been informed that I failed to mention that every voter can vote as much as and often as they wish, apparently up to 999 votes per day. I do not know why the poll permits this, but at least it can go either way as one of the yes options as well as one of the no options, so I suppose it still works out even in a way.
I have also very recently learned that if a pre-decided number of votes are cast in the poll for any one of the possible responses, that the results will be considered to be the "will of the people" and that result will stand permanently and will go into effect. I was not informed of what that number might be, but I understand that I will be informed if or when that minimum number is reached in any of the possible choices.
I am also unsure if what happens if that minimum number of votes is not reached in any of the potential choices, since prior to this I was led to believe that the links are permanent. It does seem that the poll allows for a possible change in that area, but as I've been told, the "will of the people" must and will be carried out.
Thank you to those who have already voted, and to those who take a moment cast their vote.  Your votes will apparently decide the final outcome for all time.

Further updates and any final results to come as necessary. 

Update 1: Since I cannot personally vote in a poll that is only for others to decide whether I should be and remain in a position that will at some point certainly have my friends and contacts on Facebook see me completely exposed naked, masturbating, and more, I could only wait to be informed of any results by the creator of the poll. Finally though, I did receive a link that allows me to see the current vote count. Of course since voting is anonymous, it will always remain unknown as to who voted, where they learned about the poll, and what led any voters to decide which choice to vote for.

I nearly expected no one to bother voting at all, aside from one voter who did choose to inform me that they voted. The number of votes so far is already higher than I expected, but what was most noticeable was that so far, every voter has decided that the links have to be in, and remain in the contact information on my Facebook page. What the voters want must absolutely be carried out, and so far they want me exposed naked to those who know me on Facebook. Unless the vote count changes drastically, they are going to get that very thing. With the links publicly available on my Facebook page, it will be only a matter of time before my contacts on Facebook inevitably see and click the links to my exposure. 

The poll's creator has informed me there is no plan to end the poll anytime soon, if at all, but the current results cannot be denied or ignored. Anyone who checks my Facebook page at: https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75 will see that the required links are already present in my Facebook contact information and are public. These links can never be removed unless voters allow and permit it, or if the websites they link to go offline, which is improbable and very unlikely. 

Each additional vote only seems to reinforce the fact that voters want my friends and contacts on Facebook to see me entirely exposed naked, and as of now it does seem that is what is going to happen.

Obviously I know that since it's me who is being penalized for what I've done, or more accurately for what I failed to do, I can have no say-so concerning any penalty or how it is carried out. Logically I do know that if it was another person besides for me being penalized, I would almost certainly agree that the person should have to pay some price for any violations they committed. From that standpoint, it would be hypocritical of me to expect a full, free pass in this case. 

With the links already in place on Facebook, I know I may already have been seen naked by some friends and contacts there, and as time goes by that becomes more likely if not certain. It is so far what voters have dictated through their votes though. 

I've been told that I can't consider the posting of the links as my actual punishment though, and that the links are just a means to have my punishment carried out. It has been made clear to me that I have to be seen naked for absolute certain by friends and others I know on Facebook as my actual punishment. Unless that happens, my punishment will never be considered to have been served. That only leaves the question of how many people who know me on Facebook will end up seeing me naked, since at least some of them do have to see me naked for sure. 

I did ask how this will be kept track of, and was told that it's not my concern. I was told I should accept that I was going to be seen naked by my Facebook friends and that I should remember that I deserve it for violating my contract. I was also told that the vote count only proves that beyond any doubt.

One thing is certain though. This is for real, and if, or more likely when my friends and contacts see me exposed completely naked, it will also be for real.

Update: One thing that is the hardest isn't really the fact that Facebook friends may or will end up seeing me naked. I can and will accept that fact if it is the decision of the majority of voters. I also know and understand the reason for my potential punishment of being seen naked by friends, which reminds me that I caused myself to be in the position I am in.  It's also not the hardest thing noticing that most voters so far want the links to be available for friends there to see them and then view my naked exposure

What is proving to be the hardest thing about it all is just having to wait while voters make the final decision. I've asked how long this may take, but was told that the poll will remain open to allow as many others to vote and decide the result for as long as necessary. I know better than to ask follow-up questions if I was lucky enough to receive a response at all to my inquiry, So what "as long as necessary" means is still unknown to me.

 

Google photo album of "David Steckel naked" released for public viewing.

 I don't know how long it has existed, or how many others have viewed it or that it has been shared with, but a Google photo album belonging to the holder of my exposure contract has decided to reveal it to me recently. 

The link for the album has now become required sharing for me just as many other links have been.

Along with the link, I received a short message that caused a slight knot in my stomach. I was told that the following paragraph was the only part of the message that I was permitted to share.

"David. This photo album belongs to the public just as much as the Dropbox does, and must be shared equally from now on. Among other locations, this link is required to be included in your information on Facebook along with the Dropbox and Twitter links. This is not an additional penalty, but only a correction to an existing penalty. You're aware that the price of non-compliance will be severe. The link must be posted in its proper location within 24 hours of this message being sent. As usual, you will comply without further discussion."

The link has been posted as required. Public Domain photos and videos of David Steckel naked

In one way, it does feel a bit unsettling to have another way for those on Facebook to see me exposed naked, but overall I suppose it doesn't change much. Those on Facebook could see me displayed naked already anyway if they see and click one of the links. One more link might not make much difference. 

Besides for the fact that anyone on Facebook can happen upon my naked exposure at any time, what I think about the most now is how I am in a position where one, and maybe a couple of people decide how and where links exposing me naked will be displayed, and I have to comply or else endure much worse. 

Of course I have only myself to blame for it though, since I did originally sign the contract. I failed to consider the power I was handing over then, and I didn't bother to fully grasp what the wording could require of me. I was also a bit naive and unaware of how extensive my online exposure could ever become. 

I've been told that I have already been seen by well over a million people worldwide, and that the number could be much higher. I do know just from being contacted over time, that many others have told me about how they have downloaded or saved photos or videos of me, which doesn't include any posts of me made by other people or websites. since many of those are unknown to me. I do stumble across one of them occasionally though. I can never do anything about it though, since every one of them have every right to display me naked.

I haven't been told why Facebook seems to be the focus of much of my recent exposure, but I can easily presume why that is. It is not only one of the last "bastion" where my exposure has not been openly available, but it is also a place where there is a large concentration of others who know me personally. That last part is probably the main reason though. 

I try to imagine those I know on Facebook seeing me like this:

or this:

and this:

It's much easier to accept that those on Facebook can and probably will see those and more though, if I do not try to imagine it.

Links for David Steckel on "AllMyLinks" website

 Just a notification that links related to David Steckel for websites he has activity on, or is posted or displayed naked on are now available publicly on the website "AllMyLinks" at:

                                              https://allmylinks.com/daves113065

                                                                    QR code

 

As always, the page, the links it contains, and everything on the pages that are linked to are public domain and are free for viewing, sharing, display, or re-use in any way or manner that the mind or the imagination can come up with.

Of course all can visit the Dropbox:  https://www.dropbox.com/sh/58jgt1168jivmln/3pLYLl1yYE  to view, download, share, or further display David Steckel naked in any way possible. 

Also, ALL friend requests for the Facebook page of:  https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75 must and will be accepted without question. All friends can freely post on the timeline there however they desire, and whatever they desire.

David Steckel naked and indentified

 A minor issue that was pointed out to me some time ago, which is that in some photos of me naked, I am unable to be identified. The reason for this is that some photos show my naked body in some way without my face being visible, either because the photo shows my lower body or the photo shows me from behind.

Since photos of me are already on many websites, many of which I am positive that are unknown to me, there is really no way to correct the issue completely. I was recently informed though, that in as many photos as possible of the sort described, that I need to be identified through a photo inset of my face.

The laborious task of finding and adding a face photo was begun, but part way through it I was further informed that I also needed to be identified by name as well. This meant starting over and adding what was necessary for anyone seeing the photos to be able to identify me by face and by name.

After some additional time, some of these photos now contain the necessary identification of me and are included here. As always, the photos are public domain and free for any and all uses.

Another penal-ty for David Steckel

 It came sooner than expected, but my penalty for the most recent contract breach by me has been issued. I now have a specified amount of time for the penalty to be served by me. 

See related, previous post on this topic at:

 https://davidsteckelnakedandexposed.blogspot.com/2020/10/already-another-penalty-what-is.html

There are a few parts to my penalty. The first part was me being sent the names of three people who I know personally, and are also friends with on Facebook. I was told that I had to choose one of the three to see my exposure online. If I didn't choose then those three and several others I know would be contacted and informed of how to best see my exposure.

After a lot of consideration and hesitation, I finally chose one of the three people from the list. The choice is a female friend in her thirties who was chosen partly because she seems most likely to find my exposure funny or hilarious, and very unlikely to be offended by it. She will surely laugh at me and possibly mock or ridicule me, and probably show my exposure to some of her close friends and her mother, who I also know personally.

This friend once saw me in the shower naked, but only briefly before she left the room. Her mother said that she would have stayed there and looked at me, since she'd like to "see that", meaning what her daughter saw of me and more. Once she shows my exposure to her mother, some lewd comments from the mother to me about it is probable. 

The way she has to see or discover my exposure is that she has to receive the Dropbox link by email, and have access to my full exposure. Sending her the link would not be easy to do, but I'm sure I could do it if that was what was required. 

The last part of my penalty might just be the most difficult part. Someone I know or someone I've asked has to be who sends her the link, so that she won't know if I know that she has seen my exposure. I'm not supposed to contact her at all unless she contacts me after seeing my exposure. 

There's not anyone around who I can ask to send the link to her, but I have to find someone to send it before the allotted time runs out. This requirement does make it harder and adds some humiliation by needing someone else to send the link, but she is going to receive the link anyway at some point from someone. This is the only way to limit my exposure for now to just her and whoever she shows it to. 

So please, if able, assistance is needed to simply send her an email with nothing else required to be in it besides for this link:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/58jgt1168jivmln/3pLYLl1yYE 

Her email has been given to me, which I did manage to find out that it is really her email address. For privacy purposes, it cannot be shown publicly, but it will be provided to anyone who can do the favor of sending her the Dropbox link, even if it's more than once. 

It's not clear how it will be confirmed that she has received the Dropbox link, but the contract holder has shown an ability to find or know of things that still stun me, like finding this female's email address when I never knew what it was before now. 

I admit that I am a bit desperate at this point to serve my penalty as accurately and completely as possible, since I've already received a few penalties so far and I want to try to avoid more. 

I do know this will humiliate me to her and all who she shows me to, but I accept that as a consequence of me deleting a photo that showed me naked and thinking I'd gotten away with it. 

The closest public photo(s) of me that might begin to sum up how I feel about having to be exposed to this female friend is this one:

                      David Steckel foolishly and uselessly trying to cover up while naked.
 

So, anyone willing to send her the Dropbox link, just please contact me at: DaveS113065@yahoo.com or on any website I'm on where I can be contacted, and mention that you will send her the email. Her email address and the Dropbox link will be provided. Once the email is sent by you, that's all, and my penalty will have been served. 

Thank you.

Dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/58jgt1168jivmln/3pLYLl1yYE

Twitter: https://twitter.com/davidsteckel1

 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75

David Steckel's email: daveS113065@yahoo.com

Already another penalty. What is happening?

 I've been informed by the holder of my exposure contract that more photos of me naked have shown up that aren't already included in the other public photos of me naked. I was sent a copy of the photos along with being told that I am to receive another penalty for another contract breach by me. From what I understand, one or more people used the email address to send the photos that was to be used to report me if links to the Dropbox of photos and videos of me naked, and a link to my Twitter page were not on my Facebook profile, set to public viewing, and working like the should. 

I don't know who sent them to the contract holder or where they came from, but they are definitely photos of me naked. One is clearly some faceless guy jerking off to a video of me naked putting a marker in my ass. Another one is a photo similar to what is shown on the computer screen in the first photo, and it looks like it ws clipped from the same video by someone. 

The third photo though, is one I know all about. It was taken on a cool day while I had socks on due to cold feet. It wasn't a good photo and it was taken by someone as I was reading a text on my phone. When I was required to submit every photo of me to the public domain, the photo seemed to poor to bother keeping, and I deleted what I thought was the only copy. Obviously I was wrong since the photo has reappeared. What makes it worse now is the fact that I was just penalized for other photos of me naked that suddenly appeared, and I just recently swore to the contract holder that there were no more non-public photos of me naked. 

I'm still learning to live with my last penalty of requiring the Twitter and Dropbox links permanently displayed in the contact info about me on my Facebook page, even if I mostly believe that it might go unnoticed by most who might visit the page. 

All that is required this time so far is that I am to accept any and all friend requests on Facebook, and that the posting settings there allow all friends to post on my timeline. The settings were already set that way, so really all I have to do is to accept every friend request I receive from now on. I am not to contact any new, unknown friends unless I am contacted by them first. I don't know if the intent is to make sure some new friend that I don't have yet can post something on my timeline that will expose or humiliate me to everyone I know on Facebook and beyond, or if it's just to cause my mind to run wild from the possibilities. I was told the rest of my penalty will be decided soon and that I was not to reply or contact the contact holder in the meantime. 

These are the photos that showed up:

                                                      David Steckel naked and being jerked off to

 

                                            David Steckel naked inserting a marker into his ass

                                                      David Steckel naked wearing except for short, white socks

If it was just the other two photos, I would feel I was being penalized for photos that were created from something of me that was already public domain, but the one of me with socks on is something I have no defense for. I admit that when I thought I had deleted the only copy, I thought it would never matter. I really should have just submitted it along with the rest of what was submitted. Now it's a public photo anyway and I'm due to receive a penalty because of it.

The contact holder controls the Dropbox and is the only one who can log into it. My access to it is the same as everyone else's, which I am told is to make sure that I can't affect anything in the Dropbox. By the time I received a copy of the photos from the contract holder, the photos were all already added to the Dropbox. I saw that they were titled in way that put all three of them right near the top of the page there, which I can only assume is to make sure every visitor to the Dropbox sees those photos right away. 

If or when I receive a full penalty, an update will be added here.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/58jgt1168jivmln/3pLYLl1yYE

https://twitter.com/davidsteckel1

https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75 

Public Notice for the penalty of David Steckel (naked)

 Recently, the holder of my exposure contract found me guilty of violating the contract on several occasions, mostly due to photos of me naked appearing online that I'd lost of forgotten about, but which were supposed to have been included when I confirmed that every photo and video of me naked was now publicly available.  I cannot prove that I did not know of those photos until they surfaced, so I received a penalty for my apparent withholding those photos that suddenly appeared.

My penalty is that a link from the Dropbox must be permanently shown on my Facebook page in the section where contact details are located. A permanent link to my Twitter page must also be shown there. Since my Twitter page does expose me a lot, and the Dropbox always has to offer every photo and video of me naked, I am going to be seen naked by anyone who happens to click either of the links on my Facebook page, and they will then have full access to everything in the Dropbox, all without me knowing a thing about it, and definitely without me being able to do a single thing about it. 

The holder of my exposure contract feels that my penalty must be known about as widely as possible and to be participated in by as many others as possible in order for others online to view or check out my Facebook page to make sure I am complying with and serving my penalty.The contract holder even has an email address (one which I am forbidden from using, since I am to only use a specific but different email address when needing to contact them). 

I was recently sent a notification of my penatly, which is to be displayed across the internet, and which the holder of my contract feels will call public attention to my penalty. 

I can attest now though, that I have no intention of defying my penalty. I can never know if or when someone might actually be looking at my Facebook page just to check on whether I am serving my penalty or not. It's hard for me to look at the links there on my Facebook page, since I know what they will show anyone who finds them and clicks on them, and I know the purpose of them being there is so I am seen naked by others who may never have seen me naked otherwise, including and probably especially by those I know on Facebook.

Everything that follows was sent to me by the contract holder, which I am required to include here.

     ____________________________________________________________________

                 

David Steckel has chosen to violate a valid contract. His penatly for this is quite simple and fitting. On his Facebook page of David.Steckel.75 two links must exist and both must link to their intended web pages at all times. 

The Twitter page of @DavidSteckel1 exposes David Steckel quite sufficiently, so a link to that page must be available on the Facebook page of David.Steckel.75 

A functional link to the Dropbox which contains all known photos and videos of David Steckel *naked* must  also be available.

These links belong in the contact details of David Steckel on the Facebook page in order that they be readily visible and available to any and all visitors to the Facebook page of David.Steckel.75 

Visitors to the page https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75  are asked to view or inspect this page to ensure David Steckel continues to serve his penalty without additional violations. This can be done anonymously unless informing David Steckel is desired. All that is needed is to ensure that the links remain publicly available in order for David Steckel to begin to, and to continuously serve his penalty as others on Facebook discover the links and then see him fully exposed naked. 

THIS MUST HAPPEN!! HE MUST BE SEEN NAKED BY HIS FACEBOOK CONTACTS AND BY OTHER VISITORS THERE IN ORDER FOR HIM TO SERVE OUT HIS PENALTY!!

  If either required link is not present or properly functioning, please report this fact by email to Opensourceforyou1001@gmail.com                        

The basis for this penalty is of course, to ensure that now and in the future that David Steckel is seen naked and more by any visitors to his Facebook page who click the links, with no regard whatsoever for who sees him that way, such as friends, family, co-workers, etc. This penalty will only be effective and purposeful if it is fully complied with and fully obeyed by David Steckel. The links MUST remain, and for the penalty to be effective, David Steckel's Facebook contacts and visitors MUST be able to simply click a link to have full access to his complete exposure naked.

David Steckel has admitted that it would humiliate him very much if certain contacts of his on Facebook saw his displayed naked, but he seems convinced that nobody ever visits his actual profile page on Facebook, and even if they do, they would not notice the links there. What he thinks is not relevant though. He simply must serve his penalty. 

Thank you to any who assist in the observation of the required links at:

https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75 

By doing so, you are helping to ensure that David Steckel receives the penalty he well deserves, and that something wrong is being made right again. 

The two links required on David Steckel's Facebook page are offered below:

David Steckel on Twitter:             https://twitter.com/DavidSteckel1

Dropbox-David Steckel naked:    https://www.dropbox.com/sh/58jgt1168jivmln/3pLYLl1yYE