Translate

Saturday, May 21, 2022

Increased Exposure to Facebook friends

 My exposure is now more available and easier to see for friends on Facebook. First there were the links to my exposure included in the intro of my page on Facebook. They are still there and are permanent.

https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75

Next came the page "David Steckel Exposed Exhibitionist"

https://www.facebook.com/DavidSteckelNewd/ 

All friends and also the public can see and click the intro links and visit and view the exposure page and quite a few have done that already. Since I can't know who clicks on links or what they view, I don't know much about who has seen me or is seeing me. 

After the intro links were there, I was asked a few times why there were no posts including them. One reason was that I was horrified by that idea, since posts show up in the Facebook feed of friends and followers where the person can view the post without ever visiting the page it's on. The other reason was that on Facebook every post generates a photo. Trying to post a link to a photo, video, or album generates a photo, which is always a nude photo since that's all there is on those pages. Anything nude immediately kicks in the anti-nudity algorithms on Facebook. 

A way around this was recently pointed out. Including an edited/censored photo or multiple links avoids the automatic photo generation that occurs from a single link. This removed the issue of an automatically generated nude photo when including a link in a post. It's still quite an issue for me for an actual post visible to almost every friend to have a link to a page I'm exposed on. As of now there are four posts like that posted on my Facebook page and visible to friends. 

One post has a qr code image that when it's scanned, goes to the same video that the "Watch Video" button goes to on the Facebook exposure page. It also has a link to the Google album "Public Domain photos and videos of David Steckel naked" https://photos.app.goo.gl/Mm7gGM9zctNPAr6d6

 


Another post has a link and header photo of the Facebook Exposure page:  https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75 and also a link to the Google album.


 

The third post is contains the photo from the page: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:David_Steckel.jpg with the photo cropped to avoid the algorithms. A link to the page on Wikimedia Commons is also there along with a link to the Google album. 



The fourth post is an invitation to vote in the poll to choose which video the "Watch Video" button (exposure page) and the qr code image will go to. It has a link to the poll, https://www.supersurvey.com/poll4236812x01b63125-133 and the poll page contains links to other related pages.


It's likely that these posts ended up in the Facebook homepage feed of friends, but it's unclear to me if they did or not. These are the first page posts to ever have links to my exposure that are completely available to friends, Even though it has to be this way it's not easy to see my complete exposure so available to friends. Right after the posts were made available to friends, the page views for the exposure page did go up but there's no way to know whether any viewers were also friends. Further humiliation for me seems nearly inevitable, but I know that's something that is both completely irrelevant and an intended result. The posts are also never to be removed.

Already it's been pointed out how the posts being for friends only is an issue, since I do not have any right to keep, hide, or conceal any photo or video of me naked from anyone. I do wish there could be exceptions, but obviously there can't be any. The only way it can be is for the posts to be public. If the posts didn't show up in feeds already, they will for sure when the posts become public. That's the horrifying part, but one that can't be avoided for much longer. 

For now I must apologize to anyone who isn't a Facebook friend, since they can't view the actual posts (yet). Sometime within the next ten days of this posting, the posts will have to become public and stay that way. 

Also, to anyone who prefers, likes, or enjoys the idea of me being completely exposed to the public and to people who know me, or who likes or enjoys the humiliation that may result from it for me. Once voters in a past public poll decided that photos and videos of me naked had to be seen by Facebook friends, that decision made it unavoidable and mandatory that it happen. It's proving to be more of a process that an event or a single step, but it is occurring even now. More than a dozen friends have "liked" or followed the Facebook exposure page so far, and other friends from the 230 invites sent are likely to have at least visited the page.

With four posts now visible and available to friends on my personal Facebook page, all containing a link to an album of all photos and videos of me naked and other links to pages exposing me, there's already been a coincidental increase in views. The views could be from random viewers or from friends. There's no way to tell, but in any case it means I've probably been seen or viewed naked once more. Each view could also potentially be someone who has known me for a long time and who had no idea that I was naked on the internet anywhere, discovering photos and videos of me naked. It's probable that they'd look at or watch a few things, but even if they don't they would now know I was exposed naked online. Some might never acknowledge or mention having seen me to anyone else, but there's at least a small chance that some will feel obligated to or even like sharing this information with others they know, especially if those others also know me.

Since the posts became available to friends I can almost feel my exposure to them occurring. It seems they are seeing the posts somewhere, either from a search of my name on Facebook, from their homepage feed, from my page itself, or from some sort of notification that went out to them that I wasn't sure would or did happen. 

There's a certain dreadfulness combined with eroticism that results from just waiting for friends to see any of the posts and for them to see me completely exposed and displayed naked in so many ways. They get to see everything of me, including seeing me naked and masturbating, and I get to see nothing of them or even know they saw me unless they want me to know. It's irreversible for those friends who have already seen eveything of me naked, and I can only live with any humiliation from it. Just having to wait while additional friends see the posts and discover my exposure, but knowing it's almost definite that they will is also a bit humiliating, along with the dread and eroticism. 

No complaint was intended in anything mentioned. It's mostly acknowledging how it is and how it has to be.

 I know I have to be seen naked by friends and people who know me, and they all have to be able to see everything of me naked.

 I know this is already humiliating me and is sure to humiliate me much more, but that I have to accept and endure every bit of it that occurs. 

 I know that I don't have any rights at all about who sees photos and videos of me naked, how they are used, or where they might end up. I know they are all attributed to the public domain (CC0) and are "of me" but not mine in any way. I know everyone has an equal right to view and use them as they see fit, and that it is outside of my rights and possibly even not legal for me to do anything that does or appears to violate those rights in any way. 

 I understand that because I intentionally and purposely hid, withheld, or kept the photos and videos from friends, it infringed on their right to see, copy, or share the public domain photos and videos of me naked. I understand that I now have to be exposed naked to as many friends as possible, and for them to view or be able to view all photos and videos of me naked. I understand that there is no possible way to avoid this exposure no matter how humiliating it ends up being for me.

CC0
To the extent possible under law, David Steckel has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to All existing images and videos depicting David Steckel naked in any manner.

4 comments:

  1. Hey David, I was just looking at the wikimedia picture and I noticed that you've removed your body hair in that one (as well as being naked, of course).
    Your body hair is so light it often does not show much in pictures and videos, but this is a nice crisp picture and it's definitely not there. How often do you do this? Do you think it makes you look more exposed?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Removal of body hair is a periodic thing for me. It's also for a variety of reasons. It was first done when someone who saw photos of me naked suggested that there should be at least some showing me without pubic hair. Except for my arms and head, everywhere ended up without hair.
      I liked how that felt. The weather gets hot and humid where I live and it felt cooler, especially since I don't wear underwear.
      Some people have said they prefer seeing photos of me with public hair and others said they prefer seeing me with it, so both were necessary.
      I do feel cleaner and, yes I do feel slightly more exposed with body hair removed. I especially like how much easier it is to soap up and rinse off in the shower when my body hair is removed.
      It might even be more humorous for anyone who knows me when they see a photo of me naked without body or public hair, but that would probably depend on the person seeing me.
      My body hair had been removed recently when the Wikimedia photo was taken. At the time it wasn't known that a "Wikimedia upload bot" would find the photo online and because of its public domain license would upload it and display it.
      I don't know if being without body hair in the photo had anything to do with its use on Wikimedia, but if I had a choice I may have preferred to have at least a little bit of public hair in it.
      Usually my body hair is removed every 30 to 45 days, if only for the purpose of coolness and feeling cleaner. How much body hair anyone would see when seeing me naked in person would depend on when they saw me. If my had recently been removed then I'd appear much like I do in the Wikimedia photo.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for that detailed reply. Does it really last 30 - 45 days? What removal method do you use? Or does your hair just grow very slowly?

      Delete
  2. Hey David - so many of your photos and videos include you masturbating. I'm just wondering - how often do you masturbate on average? And usually where and how?

    ReplyDelete