I have gotten away from posting as in the past, so an update seemed in order. Even though life has moved on for me, any current or future locations on or offline will remain until those who control the content there choose to remove it. Long ago I agreed and committed to never, ever remove any post exposing me regardless of who does the posting, where the posting occurs, and regardless of who may or will view the post.
From time to time I still happen across posts exposing and naming me, posted by some random uploader. The posts range from a video or two of me to a short series of photos, sometimes with a colorful description included. After coming across a previously unknown post exposing me, I generally check it out once, just to see which images or videos of me it contains. After that I just tend to pass it by and move on.
I don’t bother wondering where the photos or videos were obtained, because whether they were copied from a website or downloaded directly from the public Dropbox David Steckel Exposed Naked
The purpose of the Dropbox is to enable fairly easy public access to the public property stored in the folder.
Every existing photo or video exposing me naked in any way is, and will always remain public domain, CC0. It’s definition is pasted below.
(CC0 (Creative Commons Zero) is a public dedication tool that allows creators to waive all their copyright and related database rights in a work, placing it immediately into the worldwide public domain. It allows anyone to use, modify, distribute, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercially, without asking for permission or providing attribution)
When the licensing occurred, I must admit that I did not grasp the full implications of such a dedication to the public domain. I did understand that it was permanent and could never be revoked for any reason, which I understood to be because once dedicated and licensed, any future use of anything exposing me could be stated to have been obtained while it was still public domain, even if it was only publicly dedicated for a moment. (which there isn't and which is why everything exposing me is permanently and legally public property.
I will never stop finding it humorous that if I interfere in any way with the free usage of anything exposing me naked by anyone, anywhere, for any reason or purpose, that it can be considered as a form of infringement on their right to free use of the material.
By the time I learned this, it was too late anyway, but it bothered me less once I realized that the odds of anyone actually utilizing their right to expose me would be quite slim, since they'd have to have some interest in it, they'd need a place to do it, and would have to put at least some amount of time and effort into doing it.
It's clear that in some cases that right has been utilized though, since the random posts found online tend to show it's true. In all cases though, if the location or the website the posts occurs on allows such material, then the creator of the post has the freedom and the full right to expose me for their own purposes or interests.
Other "lifestyle" habits or rules that were enacted over time do still apply as much as possible. Such as sleeping naked and exposed to the nearby neighborhood all night long. (through an uncovered window and with sufficient illumination within the room).
There have been quite a few nights where I would prefer, but do not need a sheet for covering, but I know that would be keeping my naked body private and concealed during a time when it was not supposed to be concealed at all. It's simple enough to dismiss the thought and to get back to sleeping while remaining exposed through the window. By now most who can see me at night have probably seen me multiple times, and it's likely only newcomers to the area who see me for the first time.
Another "lifestyle" detail that always remains true is that, weather permitting, I can only wear a shirt, pants or shorts, and shoes. Three articles of clothing in total, and four if the shoes are counted as two items. This increases the odds that any wardrobe malfunction would be revealing. It also limits what has to be removed if someone approaches me in person and requests for me to strip naked. Since refusal is not an option, it's probably best for it to be quick and as easy as possible.
Of course the photos (and a video) exposing me naked will always be required to be included in any email sent by me, and in any email message that is replied to from DaveS113065@gmail.com
The five photos are designated and dedicated to each email, along with a single video of me naked and "gratifying" myself. This was intended to be, and has actually turned out to be a way to ensure that the degree to which the photos/videos are public cannot be forgotten for long. Almost every newly arrived email message serves as a reminder, since ignoring them isn't an option and sending a message or a reply without the required photos and video is also not an option. It's still pretty difficult to have to send an email to someone who knows me well, but once the first one has been sent and they've seen everything, it much easier afterwards to send future messages to them. It often requires some explaining once they see it, but once it's understood that it's an always and every time thing rather than being specifically for them alone, it seems to be either accepted or expected in later email messages.
Each email sent out also contains a link to the public Dropbox in case anyone cares to access more public photos and videos.
The email photos are shown in a previous posting, so they won't be reposted here. If anyone cares to see everything for themselves, they can simply send an email to DaveS113065@gmail.com
As for my exposure on Facebook, it continues as it has for the last couple of years. The two pages there...
David Steckel : https://www.facebook.com/david.steckel.75 and
David Steckel Exposed Exhibitionist : https://www.facebook.com/DavidSteckelNewd/
.. remain about the same, except that my personal page has somehow become a professional page where friends are combined with followers. I guess it doesn't matter much, since posts with links to my exposure are still present on both pages.
The exhibitionist page was originally intended to be entirely separate from my personal page, which at the time contained nothing referencing my online exposure. That only lasted for a while.
Comments led to polls, and poll results led to links to my exposure on my personal page being a majority opinion. Around the same time, I found that by searching my name on Facebook, clearly brought up the exhibitionist page right along with my personal page. Anyone searching my name would have both pages offered right there in front of them.
By then the exhibitionist page contained enough to expose me. No explicit photos, but links that would show much more when clicked on. I knew then that for months I'd been easier for friends to see that I had been aware. So it didn't seem like such a big deal to have permanent links to my exposure in the intro or "about me" section of my personal Facebook page. Those links are still present and as far as I am aware, they function and show what they're supposed to show. Even though removal of the links was never to be an option, after a couple of years of being there, it probably wouldn't serve much purpose. Of course people will probably always continue to see the links and even click on them, but a majority of those who know me personally are very likely aware of the links.
An issue arose when some visited my personal Facebook page and said there were no links there. I knew the links were there and I even checked to be sure. After a while it became clear that some, who may or may not have voted in the original poll, understood that links to my exposure would be posted on the page, which also meant it would appear in the page-feed of all friends and followers.
That felt like a larger step, since I knew that hundreds of people, which included lots of people who did know me personally, would be a link-click away from seeing exposing me to at least some degree. After some brief anguishing about it, I decided that if it didn't happen now, it was going to happen eventually. I also knew I was already exposed quite a bit between the exhibitionist page and the recent links in my intro. In addition to that, it would solve the issue between links on the intro, or links in a post on my page and in others Facebook feeds.
So, feeling inevitable eventually from my standpoint, a post which contained what seemed like the most convenient links for others to use, was posted and was then placed in the feed of all friends and followers. I'm rarely absolutely sure of anything, but I am absolutely sure that some portion of friends there who know me personally, along with a larger than average number of others, did positively end up seeing me naked and exposed, or more because of that single post. The post is still there and is also pinned to the top of the page, since random things like birthday wishes would know it down the page over time. Whether I visit the page or not, the post will continue being the first thing, aside from my intro, that visitors to the page will see.
I will never know how many others have ended up seeing or accessing my exposure just due to the postings on Facebook. I'm sure the average number of others discovering, viewing, or accessing my exposure over any period of time has varied a lot over time. Low at times, and higher at other times, such as when a post appears in other's feeds. With so many Facebook accounts existing, it seems impossible for others not to randomly discover my page. Of course anyone searching for and finding me on Facebook has, or is also going to find full access to my online exposure. It really only a matter of whether or not they choose to utilize that access, and then to what degree they do. But that's about where it becomes none of my business, since anything beyond that is their option or decision, and in almost any case is also within their rights. (Other than claiming full and sole ownership over any photo or video of me exposed naked. No one can legally do that due to the public domain status. But that same status also means that in some way, everyone has a sort of shared ownership over all photos and videos exposing me. Even I cannot claim them as mine in the sense of owning them, but only in the sense of the photos and videos being "of me" or showing me. In other words, photos and videos that I am in, but can never actually own again. I can have copies and use them as I see fit just as anyone else can do, but that's all.
I never imagined AI coming along, but I do wonder if AI could generate artificial but accurate looking photos of me naked. As far as I've seen, filters prevent the creation of such things. There are sure to be ways around that eventually or already, and it made me consider something.
I do not expect it to ever really be a thing, but the wording in the public domain dedication states that it applies to all photos and videos depicting David Steckel naked. That could easily be applied to photos of videos that were never actually taken of me, but ones that were created by some AI or other. They could instantly be considered public domain unless the creator copyrighted them under some other status. In either case though, I would have no reason for, and no right to input, since any source material of me that might be used is already free for all uses.
As I stated, I don't expect such a thing, but it probably should not come as a surprise to discover myself online naked and named and doing something that never occurred that way, or that never existed, at least until that point.
%20QR%20Code%20for%20this%20Dropbox.jpg)
In addition to the link(s) listed already, the qr code included is just an additional means of accessing the Dropbox.
***
Being exposed online naked and in perverted manners for all who care to see it is always going to be a permanent part of life for me. That means walking among others who may or may not have seen me naked and exposed online. Never really knowing who has seen me, but knowing there are those around me who have.
I just know that the number of others who have seen my online exposure only increases over time, and that I can never be unseen by one single person who has seen me. I also know there is no changing any of that.
No comments:
Post a Comment