Up until now, five photos of me naked have been required in any email or reply sent by me. The photos are part of the public domain and are legitimately public owned. They are not there because of any belief that everyone would want to see them. Their purpose is partly to ensure that I am always reminded of how public the photos really are, and partly because of everyone's right to see things that are public property. Any shame or humiliation for me that results is always irrelevant, and is always to be considered to be my own fault for allowing those thoughts or feelings to exist at all.
Email: DaveS113065@gmail.com
Any email received that asks a question, requires a response, or that requests a reply, must be replied to by me.
Once all photos and videos of me naked became part of the public domain, and there is no reversing it or undoing it, all that left for me is to accept it for what it was. It meant it was actually none of my business who would see or possess copies of any of those photos or videos, none of my business how they were used or what others did with them, and it meant that I could not act as if they were my own property in any way. Even the appearance that I might be attempting to limit or prevent any members of the public from accessing them for any reason could be considered to be beyond my rights in some cases.
To try to ensure that I am, or at least trying to acknowledge how I do understand the actual public-ness of all existing photos and videos of me naked, five photos were selected from among the others, and were then required to be part of an email "signature" to be included in every email sent by me, and in every reply sent by me. There is never to be an exception for this. As it always is, any shame or humiliation I think might result is only considered to be my own fault. In other words, almost nothing ever outweighs the public's right to see what is public of me.
After the first dozen or so emails containing the required signature were sent out, an anonymous comment was received asking about why no video of me was part of what had to be sent. I quoted something about the large file size or the inability to include a video in an automatically inserted email signature.
The five required photos of me are and have been:
Further comments and messages tended to mention something similar about the lack of a video, but some focused on it being a video of me masturbating. Sometimes I would be asked for reasons why a video should not be included, and I always had little or nothing to offer as a reason, especially because embarrassment or humiliation aren't relevant reasons. A question I could never answer is what makes a video any less public than a photo or a picture? I already knew the answer was, nothing.
As proof or evidence that this remains acknowledged by me, a video of me masturbating (naked) is to be part of the email requirement. No one who receives it will have to view it of course. Playing it or watching it would always be entirely intentional. But there's no way I could deny that anyone has the right to see it if they want to watch it. Actually, I can't even deny that anyone has the right to do whatever they would want to with it.
Since several different videos of me are smaller in file size, and also show me masturbating while naked, the video for emails could vary from one to another, since any one of them fills the same gap that has been pointed out to have existed until now.
But for now, it's most likely to be the one included here:
I can't help from thinking about how, when what's in this video was actually occurring, I could never have imagined it being even close to as public as it is now. One thing is sure. There is probably no way I can avoid the regular acknowledgement of everything exposing me or showing me naked is public, and that it's not outside of anyone's right to see it or to have free access to it.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/2yzbofrn4k2pdju7ncot5/h?rlkey=45zgt41wvnlrmoeoc7ft0a8sq&dl=0
In addition to regular everyday emails being received, it's probable that others might choose to send an email if only to "test" to see if the email requirement is accurately being followed. It's possible that some might just be entertained by ensuring that the photos and a video must be submitted additional times without question. Obviously it is their right to do that if they wish, since there is never an exception to the email requirement. It's also never within my rights to pick or choose who receives or possesses any photo or video of me naked, or to influence or restrict any further uses of them.
